扫描搞工作天文台

By admin in 天文台 on 2019年4月1日

问题:

How does India successfully light up the entire country at night while
China doesn’t?

为什么印度能在夜间点亮全国,中夏族民共和国却尚无?

难点讲述:

那是印度的夜间灯光图:

天文台 1

那是炎黄的:

天文台 2

为啥印度能在全国提供电力,中中原人民共和国的电力供应却大多数集中在南边呢?

回答:

印方辩友

Shashank Kumar:

Because the image is afake.

因为图是假的。

This Is not India at night. The image is actually as old as 2003 and was
created by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
scientist Chris Elvidge, to highlight population growth over time.

那不是印度的夜间灯光图像。这张图是二零零一年的,是国家海洋和大度管理局(NOAA)的物医学家Chris·埃尔维奇绘制的,用来揭破人口随时间的增长。

As NASA’s Earth Observatory says , it’s a colour-composite image created
from satellite photos over time; white areas show city lights that were
visible prior to 1992, while blue, green, and red shades indicate city
lights that became visible in 1992, 1998, and 2003 respectively. There
are several versions of this image.

就如NASA的地球天文台说的,那是见仁见智时段的卫星图像经过彩色合成的图样。深湖蓝的区域代表一九九一年前的都市灯光,铁锈色,豉豆红,和水晶色部分各自代表一九九四,1997和二〇〇四年的城市灯光。关于那张图还有很多分化版本的。

天文台 3

天文台 4

Just think why would Kashmir region be more lit while the central India
which is much more developed so sparsely lit.

如若考虑怎么克什Mill地区为何那么亮,而蓬勃的印度宗旨亮点却相对稀疏。

This image is gose viral every diwali(a festival of lights) in India
too. But it has been debunked time and time. According to NASA “In
reality, any extra light produced during Diwali is so subtle that it is
likely imperceptible when observed from space,”

那张图在每年印度排元宵节的时候也是刷屏刷的跟中病毒似的,然而已经被澄清了,NASA说排上元扩大的那一点儿额外灯光太薄弱了,根本不可能从太空观测到。

小编方辩友

Colin Mao:

According to NASA’s 2010 photos, we can see that China is not entirely
lit up. The lights are mostly gathered along the ocean and in big
cities.

上海教室是NASA
二零零六年的图像,大家能来看中国从未全境点亮。灯光首要集中在沿海和大城市地面。

There are several reasons for this:

由来如下:

·The population density in those north-west areas are far less than in
south-east areas.

·东北地区的人口密度远低于西北地区。

·The geographic problem: There are mountains and plateaus in north-west
China, which makes transport of electricity to those areas difficult.

·地理方面:中华夏族民共和国西南部多山,以高原为主,那增添了电力输送的难度。

天文台,·And as for the cost, due to low population density, it would be a waste
of money to set up electrical lines for them since only a few people are
using electricity in those areas.

·因而,因为人口密度低,用的人少,在这么些地方铺设电力网分明是不划算的。

(在此地要增加补充一下哈,这么些答复有某个误导性,政坛从未吐弃这一个地区,结束二〇一四年7月214日,小编国已落到实处全国电力周详覆盖。)

·I think the most important reason is that India has almost
thesamepopulation as China while it only has1/3 of China’s size.

·至于印度,小编觉着事关心珍视大是它有和中中原人民共和国民代表大会多的人口数,国土面积却只有中华的三分一。

Chinese big cities are all well-developed and their electric systems are
too. So don’t worry about it.

神州的大城市已经很繁荣了,电力系统也是那样,所以没啥可担心的。

Young Zhang:

天文台 5

The yellow line in this map is called Hu Line, The latest data(2015)
showed

图中的黄线是胡焕庸线。遵照2015的新星数据显示,

57% of the area, but only 6% of the population in the orange area

橘雪青的区域占国土面积的48%,人口总量却唯有6%。

43% of the area, but 94% of the population in the red area

乳白区域占国土面积的43%,人口数却高达总人口的94%。

This line in your picture is like this:

那条线呈以往灯光图中正是这么的:

天文台 6

还有别的答主晒出了环球电力供应图,中华夏族民共和国的电力供应是印度的五倍,侧面佐证了这张夜间灯光图越来越多的受地形和人数的熏陶,无法当做经济腾飞水平相比较的凭据。

天文台 7

胡焕庸线

天文台 8

上面是知识点,知识点,知识点哈~

胡焕庸线

天文台 9

即小编国著名化学家胡焕庸(一九零一-1997)在1933年提出的细分作者国人口密度的相比较线,线两侧是多个截然不相同分裂自然和人文地域。

天文台 10

胡焕庸先生

胡焕庸线又有何不可当做什么线,

小编国的城市和市场化水平分割线,

情景上的降雨线,

地势区域分割线,

文化转换的分割线,

中华民族界线

。。。

实际上,时至前些天,胡焕庸线背后公布的国情人口仍值得给予充足尊重,也是地球科研中重庆大学的课题。再度对胡老先生代表高雅的崇敬!

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

网站地图xml地图
Copyright @ 2010-2019 亚洲必赢手机官网 版权所有